By TONYA MOSLEY / KING 5 News
TACOMA, Wash. - Bikini barista Kylie Ross said the moment the new customer drove up, she had a gut feeling something wasn't right about him.
“I noticed when I was trying to make small talk that he kept his arm up against his head so the cameras couldn't see him,” she said.
She made his drink anyway, and that's when it happened.
“He just pulled out a gun and opened his car door and leaned in our window and screamed give me all of the money all of the money,” said Ross.
Surveillance video captured the customer grabbing the cash and speeding away, but not before the video camera - and Ross - focused in on some identifying marks.
“His head was shaved bald and he had tattoos all over. It kind of scared me already so it kind of scared me already and he had a teardrop,” she said.
This is not the first time Ross has been in some scary situations. an hour before, she called police after a man exposed himself, and just a few months Ago was the boiling water incident.
“Poured boiling water on a man who was fully exposed also,” she said.
And there's more. Last week, surveillance video captured someone broke into the Java Girls stand stealing money and other items.
Espresso stands are becoming easy targets. Authorities in South King County are investigating a string of robberies at local stands.
But that's not deterring Ross.
“It happens everywhere so I don’t’ think it’s because of the job. I think it’s because we're an easy target,” she said.
Experienced legal counsel to cannabis businesses, entrepreneurs, and patients.
Seattle, Washington (206) 728-0200
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
3 members of armed-robbery ring arrested in West Seattle
Three members of a suspected armed-robbery ring that has targeted convenience stores over the last month have been arrested.
By Sara Jean Green
Seattle Times staff reporter
Map data ©2008 Tele Atlas - Terms of Use
See more mapped stories
Three members of a suspected armed-robbery ring that have been accused of targeting convenience stores over the last month have been arrested.
Since early December, a group of young men armed with handguns and a sawed-off shotgun have either robbed or attempted to rob at least eight convenience stores in West Seattle, White Center and Tukwila, said Seattle police spokesman Mark Jamieson.
At 1:37 a.m. Sunday, someone inside a West Seattle convenience store called 911. Officers arrived at the store, in the 4300 block of Southwest Admiral Way, within a minute, Jamieson said. They set up a perimeter and pulled over the suspects' car within five minutes of the 911 call, he said.
A 21-year-old man and two 18-year-old men were arrested and a handgun was recovered, Jamieson said. At least one suspect, possibly more, is still at large.
"We're happy we have three people in custody but by no means is this over," he said.
No one was hurt in any of the robberies.
In earlier robberies, at least four men in their late teens or early 20s have entered stores with bandannas or hoods covering their faces. One man is usually armed with a sawed-off shotgun or a short-barreled shotgun, he said.
"They're always very aggressive. Sometimes they're successful, sometimes they haven't got anything," he said.
During one robbery attempt in West Seattle, "a clerk chased them off with a stick," Jamieson said. In another attempted robbery at a Tukwila convenience store, "the clerk saw them coming and locked himself in a backroom," he said.
Though the robbers weren't able to open the cash register at that store, Jamieson said they "had hit three other places that night."
Seattle robbery detectives, the King County Sheriff's Office and Tukwila police are investigating.
Sara Jean Green: 206-515-5654 or sgreen@seattletimes.com
By Sara Jean Green
Seattle Times staff reporter
Map data ©2008 Tele Atlas - Terms of Use
See more mapped stories
Three members of a suspected armed-robbery ring that have been accused of targeting convenience stores over the last month have been arrested.
Since early December, a group of young men armed with handguns and a sawed-off shotgun have either robbed or attempted to rob at least eight convenience stores in West Seattle, White Center and Tukwila, said Seattle police spokesman Mark Jamieson.
At 1:37 a.m. Sunday, someone inside a West Seattle convenience store called 911. Officers arrived at the store, in the 4300 block of Southwest Admiral Way, within a minute, Jamieson said. They set up a perimeter and pulled over the suspects' car within five minutes of the 911 call, he said.
A 21-year-old man and two 18-year-old men were arrested and a handgun was recovered, Jamieson said. At least one suspect, possibly more, is still at large.
"We're happy we have three people in custody but by no means is this over," he said.
No one was hurt in any of the robberies.
In earlier robberies, at least four men in their late teens or early 20s have entered stores with bandannas or hoods covering their faces. One man is usually armed with a sawed-off shotgun or a short-barreled shotgun, he said.
"They're always very aggressive. Sometimes they're successful, sometimes they haven't got anything," he said.
During one robbery attempt in West Seattle, "a clerk chased them off with a stick," Jamieson said. In another attempted robbery at a Tukwila convenience store, "the clerk saw them coming and locked himself in a backroom," he said.
Though the robbers weren't able to open the cash register at that store, Jamieson said they "had hit three other places that night."
Seattle robbery detectives, the King County Sheriff's Office and Tukwila police are investigating.
Sara Jean Green: 206-515-5654 or sgreen@seattletimes.com
Sunday, January 4, 2009
Washington State Criminal Case Law Update
By: Dena Alo-Colbeck
The following cases of note were decided recently in Washington's high courts:
Supreme Court:
State v. Nguyen: Reasoning that there is no requirement under Washington law that an offense carry a lesser potential penalty than the charged crime in order to be considered an included offense for which a defendant may be convicted even if not charged, the Supreme Court affirmed that physical control is in fact an included offense of DUI. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/807523.opn.pdf
Division One Court of Appeals:
State v. Lee: The Court affirmed Mr. Lee's conviction for possession of cocaine, holding that the totality of the circumstances supported a finding that the arresting officers had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the defendant possessed narcotics, based on an informant's statement and observations of one of the officers, and the initiation of a Terry stop was lawful at that point. The Court declined to apply the Aguilar-Spinelli test to the case with regard to the reliability and accuracy of the informant, noting that courts have long applied the totality of the circumstances test to Terry stops rather than the Aguilar-Spinelli test. The Court cited U.S. Supreme Court precedent finding that reasonable suspicion to support a Terry stop may arise from information that is less reliable than that required to establish probable cause. While there must be some indicia of reliability in the informant's tip, the Court explained that, in a totality of the circumstances test, this is but one factor to be considered by the officer, and can be weighed in light of the officer's own observations, his experience in similar situations, and the nature of the crime alleged. The Court conceded that the Aguilar-Spinelli test continues to be the proper test to be applied with regard to informant reliability with regard to search warrants, but noted that such warrants are held to a higher standard than an investigatory stop. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60669-7.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Osman: The Court reversed a superior court determination finding that a missing portion of a district court record was significant and material, finding that RALJ 5.4, which allows the district court to determine whether the missing portion of the record is significant and material, also provides for review under an abuse of discretion standard, not the de novo standard applied by the Superior court. The Court further found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the missing portion of the tape was not significant or material, and that the missing portion of the tape wsa not necessarily violative of due process until the defendant could demonstrate prejudice thereby. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60359-1.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Alphonse: The Court upheld the defendant's conviction for telephone harassment, finding that the "to convict" instruction, even if erroneous, could not be a basis for overturning the conviction as it had been proposed by the defendant. The Court further found that even with the correct instruction there would have been ample evidence to convict Mr. Alphonse. The Court rejected the defendant's assertion that the calls to a police officer were protected First Amendment speech because they were made as a lawful petition to a government official for redress of grievences, holding that once Mr. Alphonse turned to speech that was designed to harass, intimidate, or embarass the officer, the speech was removed from First Amendment protection and became criminal. The Court further rejected a challenge to the statute itself, finding that the requirement that the speaker form an intent to harass, coupled with the requirement that the speech itself be lew or profane or threatening sufficiently narrowed the harassing speech, and finding that the statute was not vague as it sufficiently described the prohibited speech, and the defendant had not demonstrated that the statute might be arbitrarily or selectively enforced. Finally, the Court did vacate a banishment order prohibiting the defendant from entering the City of Everett that had been imposed as part of the sentence, finding that less restricitive means were available to protect the victims, the restriction was unrelated to rehabilitation, and the order did not allow the defendant to petition to lift the restriction. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/58449-9.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Johnson: The trial court had dated Mr. Johnson's certificate of discharge effective as of the date of the defendant's petition for such certificate, rather than making the certificate effective as of the date that Mr. Johnson completed the terms of his sentence. The Court of Appeals remanded for further findings of fact to determine the date the court was notified that Mr. Johnson had completed the terms of his sentence, holding that this date would be the appropriate date for the certificate. A copy of the decision ay be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/61311-1.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Linerud aka Cain: The Court held that when the trial court did not make an initial determination of the length of the defendant's sentence and required the DOC to calculate the defendant's time served to ensure that it did not exceed the statutory maximum, such action rendered the sentence indeterminate and in violation of the SRA. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60769-3.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Larkins: The Court found that the defendant's Ohio burglary conviction, which rested on his intent to commit a misdemeanor, which category included crimes other than those against persons or property, was not equivalent to a burglary conviction under Washington law, because such conviction would require intent to commit a crime against a person or property only. Thus the matter was remanded for resentencing, with the Ohio conviction to be removed from the defendant's offender score. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/59559-8.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Berg: The Court vacated one conviction of third degree child molestation, finding that the jury was not properly instructed that they must find a separate and distinct act for each identically charged molestation count and the defendant was therefore subjected to double jeopardy. The Court did uphold the remainder of the convictions against the defendant, finding no error in a detective's testimony about other abuse investigations, as the defendant opened the door to that testimony. The Court further remanded for resentencing, finding that the defendant's sentence exceeded the statutory maximum for the crime charged. It upheld, however, a sentencing condition restricting contact with the defendant's biological daughter as a necessary prohibition to protect the child from similar abuse. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60729-4.pub.doc.pdf
Divison Two Court of Appeals:
State v. S.A.W.: The defendant's conviction was reversed and the case remanded for a new hearing due to the juvenile court's failure to conduct an independent assessment, through a CrR 3.5 hearing, of the credibility and voluntariness and, consequently, the admissibility, of the defendant's post-arrest oral incriminating statement, instead basing the admissibility of the statement solely on the trial testimony of one of the investigating officers. The Court heard the case despite the defendant's failure to request a 3.5 hearing prior to trial and his failure to object to the trial court not holding such a hearing, finding that the juvenile court based its adjudication on the defendant's testimony and thus the appeal raised a consittutional issue, because the defendant had the right to "have the voluntariness of an incriminating statement assessed prior to its admission." A copy of this decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/36336-4.08.cor.doc.pdf
State v. Harris: The Court affirmed the trial court's calculation of the defendant's offender score, finding that the State proved his prior Louisiana convictions by a preponderance of the evidence through production of packets of documents for each offense including a felony bill of information, a page containing a stamp with specific language, the defendant's fingerprints, and a signature, and an extract of the court minutes for the trial court judge's oral sentencing ruling. Though the documents were did not include certified copies of the judgment and sentence, the Court found the documents provided sufficient to establish the prior convictions when the State on appeal was able to cite a Louisiana statute defining how that state documents a judgment, in essence, that it utilizes the very documents provided by the state at the sentencing hearing. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/36725-4.08.doc.pdf
State v. Morgensen: The Court found no error in the trial court's decision to allow the jury to review the audiotape of the witnesses' trial testimony in its entirety during deliberations, holding that the trial court had carefully reviewed the Koontz factors in making that decision. The Court further found that the defendant failed to timely object to having his previous defense counsel preside over his current trial, and thus waived that objection. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/36853-6.08.doc.pdf
The following cases of note were decided recently in Washington's high courts:
Supreme Court:
State v. Nguyen: Reasoning that there is no requirement under Washington law that an offense carry a lesser potential penalty than the charged crime in order to be considered an included offense for which a defendant may be convicted even if not charged, the Supreme Court affirmed that physical control is in fact an included offense of DUI. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/807523.opn.pdf
Division One Court of Appeals:
State v. Lee: The Court affirmed Mr. Lee's conviction for possession of cocaine, holding that the totality of the circumstances supported a finding that the arresting officers had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the defendant possessed narcotics, based on an informant's statement and observations of one of the officers, and the initiation of a Terry stop was lawful at that point. The Court declined to apply the Aguilar-Spinelli test to the case with regard to the reliability and accuracy of the informant, noting that courts have long applied the totality of the circumstances test to Terry stops rather than the Aguilar-Spinelli test. The Court cited U.S. Supreme Court precedent finding that reasonable suspicion to support a Terry stop may arise from information that is less reliable than that required to establish probable cause. While there must be some indicia of reliability in the informant's tip, the Court explained that, in a totality of the circumstances test, this is but one factor to be considered by the officer, and can be weighed in light of the officer's own observations, his experience in similar situations, and the nature of the crime alleged. The Court conceded that the Aguilar-Spinelli test continues to be the proper test to be applied with regard to informant reliability with regard to search warrants, but noted that such warrants are held to a higher standard than an investigatory stop. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60669-7.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Osman: The Court reversed a superior court determination finding that a missing portion of a district court record was significant and material, finding that RALJ 5.4, which allows the district court to determine whether the missing portion of the record is significant and material, also provides for review under an abuse of discretion standard, not the de novo standard applied by the Superior court. The Court further found that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the missing portion of the tape was not significant or material, and that the missing portion of the tape wsa not necessarily violative of due process until the defendant could demonstrate prejudice thereby. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60359-1.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Alphonse: The Court upheld the defendant's conviction for telephone harassment, finding that the "to convict" instruction, even if erroneous, could not be a basis for overturning the conviction as it had been proposed by the defendant. The Court further found that even with the correct instruction there would have been ample evidence to convict Mr. Alphonse. The Court rejected the defendant's assertion that the calls to a police officer were protected First Amendment speech because they were made as a lawful petition to a government official for redress of grievences, holding that once Mr. Alphonse turned to speech that was designed to harass, intimidate, or embarass the officer, the speech was removed from First Amendment protection and became criminal. The Court further rejected a challenge to the statute itself, finding that the requirement that the speaker form an intent to harass, coupled with the requirement that the speech itself be lew or profane or threatening sufficiently narrowed the harassing speech, and finding that the statute was not vague as it sufficiently described the prohibited speech, and the defendant had not demonstrated that the statute might be arbitrarily or selectively enforced. Finally, the Court did vacate a banishment order prohibiting the defendant from entering the City of Everett that had been imposed as part of the sentence, finding that less restricitive means were available to protect the victims, the restriction was unrelated to rehabilitation, and the order did not allow the defendant to petition to lift the restriction. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/58449-9.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Johnson: The trial court had dated Mr. Johnson's certificate of discharge effective as of the date of the defendant's petition for such certificate, rather than making the certificate effective as of the date that Mr. Johnson completed the terms of his sentence. The Court of Appeals remanded for further findings of fact to determine the date the court was notified that Mr. Johnson had completed the terms of his sentence, holding that this date would be the appropriate date for the certificate. A copy of the decision ay be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/61311-1.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Linerud aka Cain: The Court held that when the trial court did not make an initial determination of the length of the defendant's sentence and required the DOC to calculate the defendant's time served to ensure that it did not exceed the statutory maximum, such action rendered the sentence indeterminate and in violation of the SRA. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60769-3.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Larkins: The Court found that the defendant's Ohio burglary conviction, which rested on his intent to commit a misdemeanor, which category included crimes other than those against persons or property, was not equivalent to a burglary conviction under Washington law, because such conviction would require intent to commit a crime against a person or property only. Thus the matter was remanded for resentencing, with the Ohio conviction to be removed from the defendant's offender score. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/59559-8.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Berg: The Court vacated one conviction of third degree child molestation, finding that the jury was not properly instructed that they must find a separate and distinct act for each identically charged molestation count and the defendant was therefore subjected to double jeopardy. The Court did uphold the remainder of the convictions against the defendant, finding no error in a detective's testimony about other abuse investigations, as the defendant opened the door to that testimony. The Court further remanded for resentencing, finding that the defendant's sentence exceeded the statutory maximum for the crime charged. It upheld, however, a sentencing condition restricting contact with the defendant's biological daughter as a necessary prohibition to protect the child from similar abuse. A copy of the decision may be found online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60729-4.pub.doc.pdf
Divison Two Court of Appeals:
State v. S.A.W.: The defendant's conviction was reversed and the case remanded for a new hearing due to the juvenile court's failure to conduct an independent assessment, through a CrR 3.5 hearing, of the credibility and voluntariness and, consequently, the admissibility, of the defendant's post-arrest oral incriminating statement, instead basing the admissibility of the statement solely on the trial testimony of one of the investigating officers. The Court heard the case despite the defendant's failure to request a 3.5 hearing prior to trial and his failure to object to the trial court not holding such a hearing, finding that the juvenile court based its adjudication on the defendant's testimony and thus the appeal raised a consittutional issue, because the defendant had the right to "have the voluntariness of an incriminating statement assessed prior to its admission." A copy of this decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/36336-4.08.cor.doc.pdf
State v. Harris: The Court affirmed the trial court's calculation of the defendant's offender score, finding that the State proved his prior Louisiana convictions by a preponderance of the evidence through production of packets of documents for each offense including a felony bill of information, a page containing a stamp with specific language, the defendant's fingerprints, and a signature, and an extract of the court minutes for the trial court judge's oral sentencing ruling. Though the documents were did not include certified copies of the judgment and sentence, the Court found the documents provided sufficient to establish the prior convictions when the State on appeal was able to cite a Louisiana statute defining how that state documents a judgment, in essence, that it utilizes the very documents provided by the state at the sentencing hearing. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/36725-4.08.doc.pdf
State v. Morgensen: The Court found no error in the trial court's decision to allow the jury to review the audiotape of the witnesses' trial testimony in its entirety during deliberations, holding that the trial court had carefully reviewed the Koontz factors in making that decision. The Court further found that the defendant failed to timely object to having his previous defense counsel preside over his current trial, and thus waived that objection. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/36853-6.08.doc.pdf
Thursday, January 1, 2009
Seattle settles libel suit with former cop
The city of Seattle has agreed to pay $12,000 to settle a libel suit filed by former police officer John Powers alleging, among other things, that city officials leaked defamatory statements to Seattle Times reporters.
By Maureen O'Hagan
Seattle Times staff repo
The city of Seattle has agreed to pay $12,000 to settle a libel suit filed by former police officer John Powers alleging, among other things, that city officials leaked defamatory statements to Seattle Times reporters.
The settlement puts to rest a $6 million federal lawsuit Powers filed in 2006, claiming that false information cost him his job and his reputation. The city has not admitted to any wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
Powers, an eight-year veteran, was a key figure in a lengthy FBI investigation into alleged on- and off-duty misconduct by several Seattle police officers who patrolled the Belltown neighborhood.
The Seattle Times wrote about the investigation, which stemmed from allegations that Powers and others in 2004 and 2005 accepted favors from businesses and overlooked illegal drug use.
The investigation did not result in criminal charges. However, Powers was fired in 2005 after Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske found several instances of misconduct, including supplying cocaine to a former girlfriend. A civil-service commission later upheld his firing, finding "a wide-ranging pattern of misconduct."
A decision to strip Powers of his license to be a law-enforcement officer is on appeal, according to the city attorney's office.
Under the terms of the settlement, the money will go directly to Powers' attorney, Susan Rae Sampson, as partial payment of her costs and fees.
According to a statement by the city attorney's office, the settlement was a business decision to resolve the case economically. Several city employees were named in the lawsuit, which meant the city was required to hire outside counsel, rather than relying solely on city attorneys.
"The amount represents a fraction of what it would have cost the city to pursue the case through complete dismissal," the statement said.
The Times was not named in the lawsuit; however, three reporters were subpoenaed to reveal their confidential sources. Those subpoenas were ultimately withdrawn.
Maureen O'Hagan: 206-464-2562 or mohagan@seattletimes.com
By Maureen O'Hagan
Seattle Times staff repo
The city of Seattle has agreed to pay $12,000 to settle a libel suit filed by former police officer John Powers alleging, among other things, that city officials leaked defamatory statements to Seattle Times reporters.
The settlement puts to rest a $6 million federal lawsuit Powers filed in 2006, claiming that false information cost him his job and his reputation. The city has not admitted to any wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
Powers, an eight-year veteran, was a key figure in a lengthy FBI investigation into alleged on- and off-duty misconduct by several Seattle police officers who patrolled the Belltown neighborhood.
The Seattle Times wrote about the investigation, which stemmed from allegations that Powers and others in 2004 and 2005 accepted favors from businesses and overlooked illegal drug use.
The investigation did not result in criminal charges. However, Powers was fired in 2005 after Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske found several instances of misconduct, including supplying cocaine to a former girlfriend. A civil-service commission later upheld his firing, finding "a wide-ranging pattern of misconduct."
A decision to strip Powers of his license to be a law-enforcement officer is on appeal, according to the city attorney's office.
Under the terms of the settlement, the money will go directly to Powers' attorney, Susan Rae Sampson, as partial payment of her costs and fees.
According to a statement by the city attorney's office, the settlement was a business decision to resolve the case economically. Several city employees were named in the lawsuit, which meant the city was required to hire outside counsel, rather than relying solely on city attorneys.
"The amount represents a fraction of what it would have cost the city to pursue the case through complete dismissal," the statement said.
The Times was not named in the lawsuit; however, three reporters were subpoenaed to reveal their confidential sources. Those subpoenas were ultimately withdrawn.
Maureen O'Hagan: 206-464-2562 or mohagan@seattletimes.com
Barkley 'disappointed' after DUI arrest
(CNN) -- Basketball commentator and former hoops star Charles Barkley was arrested Wednesday in Scottsdale, Arizona, on suspicion of drunken driving, a police spokesman said.
Barkley issued a brief statement, saying, "I am disappointed that I put myself in that situation. The Scottsdale police were fantastic. I will not comment any further as it is a legal matter."
Lt. Eric Shuhandler of the Gilbert Police Department said an officer pulled Barkley over after he ran a stop sign in Scottsdale's Old Town area, a trendy spot known for its nightclubs and bars. Gilbert and Scottsdale are in the Phoenix metro area.
"The officer identified the driver of the 2005 Infiniti as Charles Barkley," according to a written statement from police. "Mr. Barkley was administered the standard field sobriety tests after the odor of intoxicating liquor was detected."
At a news conference later in the day, Shuhandler said Barkley's "performance on the field sobriety test revealed there was probable cause to make an arrest."
Barkley declined to take a breath test to measure his blood-alcohol level, Shuhandler said earlier.
"When he arrived at the station, police administered a blood test, which is customary of our police department to do," he said, adding that Barkley consented to the blood test.
It will take "a few days" for the crime lab to test the blood sample and determine Barkley's blood-alcohol level, Shuhandler said.
The former NBA power forward was cited for driving while impaired and released.
"It was a pretty routine arrest," Shuhandler said.
Barkley's sport-utility vehicle was impounded under mandatory vehicle impound laws, police said.
Shuhandler said Barkley behaved professionally during the booking and was "very respectful and cordial with our officers."
Barkley, 45, is a commentator for TNT's coverage of the NBA.
In October, he told CNN's Campbell Brown that he plans to run for governor of his home state of Alabama in 2014, saying, "I can't screw up Alabama. We are number 48 in everything and Arkansas and Mississippi aren't going anywhere."
Although he is well known for entertaining comments and a cocky attitude, he also compiled an impressive résumé as a professional basketball player.
A Hall of Famer and 11-time All-Star, Barkley is one of four players in history to rack up more than 20,000 points, 10,000 rebounds and 4,000 assists in a career. He also earned the NBA's most valuable player designation in 1993 and brought home gold medals with the U.S. Olympic basketball team in 1992 and 1996.
His commanding performance on the court earned him the nicknames "Sir Charles" and the "Round Mound of Rebound."
Barkley was drafted out of Auburn University in 1984 by the Philadelphia 76ers and played 16 seasons with the Sixers, Phoenix Suns and Houston Rockets before he was permanently sidelined in 1999 with a ruptured tendon in his left knee.
Barkley issued a brief statement, saying, "I am disappointed that I put myself in that situation. The Scottsdale police were fantastic. I will not comment any further as it is a legal matter."
Lt. Eric Shuhandler of the Gilbert Police Department said an officer pulled Barkley over after he ran a stop sign in Scottsdale's Old Town area, a trendy spot known for its nightclubs and bars. Gilbert and Scottsdale are in the Phoenix metro area.
"The officer identified the driver of the 2005 Infiniti as Charles Barkley," according to a written statement from police. "Mr. Barkley was administered the standard field sobriety tests after the odor of intoxicating liquor was detected."
At a news conference later in the day, Shuhandler said Barkley's "performance on the field sobriety test revealed there was probable cause to make an arrest."
Barkley declined to take a breath test to measure his blood-alcohol level, Shuhandler said earlier.
"When he arrived at the station, police administered a blood test, which is customary of our police department to do," he said, adding that Barkley consented to the blood test.
It will take "a few days" for the crime lab to test the blood sample and determine Barkley's blood-alcohol level, Shuhandler said.
The former NBA power forward was cited for driving while impaired and released.
"It was a pretty routine arrest," Shuhandler said.
Barkley's sport-utility vehicle was impounded under mandatory vehicle impound laws, police said.
Shuhandler said Barkley behaved professionally during the booking and was "very respectful and cordial with our officers."
Barkley, 45, is a commentator for TNT's coverage of the NBA.
In October, he told CNN's Campbell Brown that he plans to run for governor of his home state of Alabama in 2014, saying, "I can't screw up Alabama. We are number 48 in everything and Arkansas and Mississippi aren't going anywhere."
Although he is well known for entertaining comments and a cocky attitude, he also compiled an impressive résumé as a professional basketball player.
A Hall of Famer and 11-time All-Star, Barkley is one of four players in history to rack up more than 20,000 points, 10,000 rebounds and 4,000 assists in a career. He also earned the NBA's most valuable player designation in 1993 and brought home gold medals with the U.S. Olympic basketball team in 1992 and 1996.
His commanding performance on the court earned him the nicknames "Sir Charles" and the "Round Mound of Rebound."
Barkley was drafted out of Auburn University in 1984 by the Philadelphia 76ers and played 16 seasons with the Sixers, Phoenix Suns and Houston Rockets before he was permanently sidelined in 1999 with a ruptured tendon in his left knee.
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Police investigating teen girl's death
P-I STAFF
Authorities are investigating the death of a 16-year-old girl found inside her apartment in the 200 block of Alaskan Way South, Seattle police reported Tuesday.
There were no signs of struggle or foul play but the King County Medical Examiner's Office has yet to determine how the girl died.
On Monday, the girl's father called police about 11:15 a.m. to the apartment, where the girl lived with her mother. The father had been unable to reach his daughter and went to check on her. He found her unconscious on a bedroom floor, police spokeswoman Renee Witt said.
Medics pronounced her dead at the scene, Witt said.
Homicide detectives were called to investigate, which is required any time there is a death involving someone under the age of 18, Witt said.
Authorities are investigating the death of a 16-year-old girl found inside her apartment in the 200 block of Alaskan Way South, Seattle police reported Tuesday.
There were no signs of struggle or foul play but the King County Medical Examiner's Office has yet to determine how the girl died.
On Monday, the girl's father called police about 11:15 a.m. to the apartment, where the girl lived with her mother. The father had been unable to reach his daughter and went to check on her. He found her unconscious on a bedroom floor, police spokeswoman Renee Witt said.
Medics pronounced her dead at the scene, Witt said.
Homicide detectives were called to investigate, which is required any time there is a death involving someone under the age of 18, Witt said.
Prosecutors appeal Ressam sentence
P-I STAFF
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Seattle appealed Tuesday the 22-year sentence imposed on convicted terrorist Ahmed Ressam.
An alert customs officer in Port Angeles thwarted Ressam's plot to bomb Los Angeles International Airport during the millennium holiday rush in 1999 when she stopped him as he drove off the Victoria ferry with a trunk full of explosives.
An appeals court sent the case back to U.S. District Judge John Coughenour for resentencing because of his failure at Ressam's original sentencing in 2005 to clearly enumerate how he had calculated Ressam's sentence under federal guidelines. Coughenour rejected a request from prosecutors at a Dec. 3 hearing that Ressam be sentenced to life in prison because he has stopped cooperating with investigators, instead re-imposing a 22-year sentence.
At the time, prosecutors said they intended to appeal.
The U.S. Attorney's Office in Seattle appealed Tuesday the 22-year sentence imposed on convicted terrorist Ahmed Ressam.
An alert customs officer in Port Angeles thwarted Ressam's plot to bomb Los Angeles International Airport during the millennium holiday rush in 1999 when she stopped him as he drove off the Victoria ferry with a trunk full of explosives.
An appeals court sent the case back to U.S. District Judge John Coughenour for resentencing because of his failure at Ressam's original sentencing in 2005 to clearly enumerate how he had calculated Ressam's sentence under federal guidelines. Coughenour rejected a request from prosecutors at a Dec. 3 hearing that Ressam be sentenced to life in prison because he has stopped cooperating with investigators, instead re-imposing a 22-year sentence.
At the time, prosecutors said they intended to appeal.
Friday, December 26, 2008
DNA leads to charges in years old Yakima County rape cases
An unknown rape suspect has been charged in connection with two attacks that happened more than seven years ago — based only on DNA.
By Mark Morey
Yakima Herald-Republic
YAKIMA — An unknown rape suspect has been charged in connection with two attacks that happened more than seven years ago — based only on DNA.
The charges are the first time such a case has been filed in Yakima County, said deputy prosecutor Patti Powers, who handles many of the county's sex-crime cases.
The move stops the clock on the statute of limitations, which would expire 10 years from the incidents.
If the suspect is arrested in connection with another crime that requires the collection of DNA — such as rape or another violent offense — then Yakima County's charges could be pursued.
As DNA technology has improved, police around the country have reviewed older cases in hopes of making a match.
Yakima police Capt. Greg Copeland said detectives have examined most or all of the pending cases in which they believe DNA could be useful.
The analysis was performed at a state crime labs. The Washington State Patrol, which operates the labs, does not track how many DNA-only rape charges have been filed, but several similar cases have been filed in other counties.
The two sexual assaults mentioned in the charges — which were filed last week — are a rare example of stranger rape in the Yakima area, Copeland said. Most rape cases involve family members or acquaintances.
The first case was reported on July 27, 2000. A woman who was then 38 years old said she was walking from a downtown nightclub around midnight when the attacker walked up behind her near Fifth Avenue and D Street. He grabbed her and said he would walk her home, then led her toward some bushes, where he raped her, according to the police report.
The second case was reported on Feb. 26, 2001.
A woman, who was then 54 years old, reported she was looking for the family's pet in the 500 block of North Second Street when the suspect walked up from behind her. He overpowered and sexually assaulted her, according to the police report.
The victims were only able to provide a vague description of the suspect.
By Mark Morey
Yakima Herald-Republic
YAKIMA — An unknown rape suspect has been charged in connection with two attacks that happened more than seven years ago — based only on DNA.
The charges are the first time such a case has been filed in Yakima County, said deputy prosecutor Patti Powers, who handles many of the county's sex-crime cases.
The move stops the clock on the statute of limitations, which would expire 10 years from the incidents.
If the suspect is arrested in connection with another crime that requires the collection of DNA — such as rape or another violent offense — then Yakima County's charges could be pursued.
As DNA technology has improved, police around the country have reviewed older cases in hopes of making a match.
Yakima police Capt. Greg Copeland said detectives have examined most or all of the pending cases in which they believe DNA could be useful.
The analysis was performed at a state crime labs. The Washington State Patrol, which operates the labs, does not track how many DNA-only rape charges have been filed, but several similar cases have been filed in other counties.
The two sexual assaults mentioned in the charges — which were filed last week — are a rare example of stranger rape in the Yakima area, Copeland said. Most rape cases involve family members or acquaintances.
The first case was reported on July 27, 2000. A woman who was then 38 years old said she was walking from a downtown nightclub around midnight when the attacker walked up behind her near Fifth Avenue and D Street. He grabbed her and said he would walk her home, then led her toward some bushes, where he raped her, according to the police report.
The second case was reported on Feb. 26, 2001.
A woman, who was then 54 years old, reported she was looking for the family's pet in the 500 block of North Second Street when the suspect walked up from behind her. He overpowered and sexually assaulted her, according to the police report.
The victims were only able to provide a vague description of the suspect.
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Driver arrested after striking pedestrian on SR 202
P-I Staff
A Bellevue man was arrested late Sunday after his vehicle struck a pedestrian walking along State Route 202 in Fall City, the Washington State Patrol reported.
The 53-year-old driver was booked into the King County Jail for investigation of vehicular assault. The pedestrian, Matthew R. Mahaffey, 34, of Snoqualmie, was taken to Harborview Medical Center, the State Patrol reported.
The collision was reported just before 7:30 p.m. The 1991 Honda Civic was heading west when it struck Mahaffey. Investigators think the driver was under the influence, the State Patrol reported.
A Bellevue man was arrested late Sunday after his vehicle struck a pedestrian walking along State Route 202 in Fall City, the Washington State Patrol reported.
The 53-year-old driver was booked into the King County Jail for investigation of vehicular assault. The pedestrian, Matthew R. Mahaffey, 34, of Snoqualmie, was taken to Harborview Medical Center, the State Patrol reported.
The collision was reported just before 7:30 p.m. The 1991 Honda Civic was heading west when it struck Mahaffey. Investigators think the driver was under the influence, the State Patrol reported.
Friday, December 19, 2008
Man found shot in Snohomish
By JON NAITO
P-I REPORTER
A 49-year-old Snohomish man was found wounded Friday morning from a gunshot to the head, according to the Snohomish County Sheriff's Office.
Deputies responded to a 911 call from the victim's brother about 9:17 a.m. The brother said he went to the man's home on the 6100 block of 171st Avenue Southeast after he had not heard from him for several days.
The brother told deputies that he found the man on his bedroom floor with a single wound to his head. A gun and gun-cleaning rod were found near the victim, and there was no indication of foul play, the sheriff's office said. The man was airlifted to Harborview Medical Center.
P-I REPORTER
A 49-year-old Snohomish man was found wounded Friday morning from a gunshot to the head, according to the Snohomish County Sheriff's Office.
Deputies responded to a 911 call from the victim's brother about 9:17 a.m. The brother said he went to the man's home on the 6100 block of 171st Avenue Southeast after he had not heard from him for several days.
The brother told deputies that he found the man on his bedroom floor with a single wound to his head. A gun and gun-cleaning rod were found near the victim, and there was no indication of foul play, the sheriff's office said. The man was airlifted to Harborview Medical Center.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Jury set to decide fate of deputy charged in civil rights case
By SCOTT GUTIERREZ
P-I REPORTER
Jurors are expected to begin deliberating Wednesday whether a King County sheriff's deputy violated a woman's civil rights by allegedly striking her several times while she was handcuffed.
Brian Bonnar, 42, is charged in U.S. District Court with depriving Irene Damon of her civil rights by using excessive force against her. On Oct. 22, 2005, Damon, a known crack addict, led police on a high-speed chase through Burien and White Center and then, after she stopped, fought with deputies trying to arrest her. Damon had rammed two patrol cars.
One of her passengers, Alvin Wafer, was wanted on a warrant for selling crack.
"Everyone, including those who commit crimes, have rights under the Constitution that should be protected," Assistant U.S. Attorney Kelly Harris said during his closing argument Tuesday.
Bonnar is accused of kneeing Damon in the head at least twice and slamming her head against a patrol car after she'd been handcuffed for resisting arrest. Four deputies testified during the weeklong trial that they saw Bonnar strike Damon, although with variations in their accounts. Many of the witnesses had also struggled with Damon on the ground.
Bonnar, whose trial began last Tuesday before Judge Thomas Zilly, also is charged with making false declarations to a grand jury about his conduct. The case marks the first time in at least a decade that a law enforcement officer has been charged under the civil rights statute.
Defense attorney David Allen urged jurors in his closing argument to see things from Bonnar's view -- to see that he had to make split-second decisions while tangled with a belligerent suspect who might be armed.
More important, Allen said, were photos of Damon's face after the episode. The photos, displayed in court, showed her face absent of bruises, serious swelling or bleeding, raising doubts about the accusations leveled by other deputies, he said.
Bonnar had two years on the job and less experience than other officers, he said.
"It's remarkable in my mind that Deputy Bonnar is on trial after what Ms. Damon and Mr. Wafer have done, after the mischief they have caused," Allen said.
Harris reminded jurors that evidence of "physical pain, no matter how temporary" is enough to convict a police officer under the civil-rights statute.
Bonnar was suspended for 20 days after an internal investigation, something the jury did not hear. His superiors found that his actions were out of control and recommended that he be fired.
But Sheriff Sue Rahr opted for suspension after conferring with department legal advisers, who thought Bonnar would win an appeal.
P-I REPORTER
Jurors are expected to begin deliberating Wednesday whether a King County sheriff's deputy violated a woman's civil rights by allegedly striking her several times while she was handcuffed.
Brian Bonnar, 42, is charged in U.S. District Court with depriving Irene Damon of her civil rights by using excessive force against her. On Oct. 22, 2005, Damon, a known crack addict, led police on a high-speed chase through Burien and White Center and then, after she stopped, fought with deputies trying to arrest her. Damon had rammed two patrol cars.
One of her passengers, Alvin Wafer, was wanted on a warrant for selling crack.
"Everyone, including those who commit crimes, have rights under the Constitution that should be protected," Assistant U.S. Attorney Kelly Harris said during his closing argument Tuesday.
Bonnar is accused of kneeing Damon in the head at least twice and slamming her head against a patrol car after she'd been handcuffed for resisting arrest. Four deputies testified during the weeklong trial that they saw Bonnar strike Damon, although with variations in their accounts. Many of the witnesses had also struggled with Damon on the ground.
Bonnar, whose trial began last Tuesday before Judge Thomas Zilly, also is charged with making false declarations to a grand jury about his conduct. The case marks the first time in at least a decade that a law enforcement officer has been charged under the civil rights statute.
Defense attorney David Allen urged jurors in his closing argument to see things from Bonnar's view -- to see that he had to make split-second decisions while tangled with a belligerent suspect who might be armed.
More important, Allen said, were photos of Damon's face after the episode. The photos, displayed in court, showed her face absent of bruises, serious swelling or bleeding, raising doubts about the accusations leveled by other deputies, he said.
Bonnar had two years on the job and less experience than other officers, he said.
"It's remarkable in my mind that Deputy Bonnar is on trial after what Ms. Damon and Mr. Wafer have done, after the mischief they have caused," Allen said.
Harris reminded jurors that evidence of "physical pain, no matter how temporary" is enough to convict a police officer under the civil-rights statute.
Bonnar was suspended for 20 days after an internal investigation, something the jury did not hear. His superiors found that his actions were out of control and recommended that he be fired.
But Sheriff Sue Rahr opted for suspension after conferring with department legal advisers, who thought Bonnar would win an appeal.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Feds: Drug smuggling attempt busted at Birch Point
Federal officials say two Canadians were arrested on a beach in northwest Washington as they were allegedly preparing to smuggle about 260 pounds of cocaine into Canada on a personal watercraft.
SEATTLE —
Federal officials say two Canadians were arrested on a beach in northwest Washington as they were allegedly preparing to smuggle about 260 pounds of cocaine into Canada on a personal watercraft.
A spokeswoman for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, Lorie Dankers, says 48-year-old Dhymitruy Bouryiotis and 36-year-old Montgomery Read Hill, both from the Vancouver, British Columbia, area, were arrested for investigation of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute.
An agency news release says that at about 1:30 a.m. Friday, federal border agents observed a person, later identified as Bouryiotis, moving heavy objects from a home to the shoreline at Birch Point, southwest of Blaine and a short distance south of the Canadian border.
About 2:30 a.m., a personal watercraft approached the beach and the operator, identified as Hill, met up with Bouryiotis on the beach, where they were arrested.
Agents found five bags on the beach filled with packages of suspected cocaine.
SEATTLE —
Federal officials say two Canadians were arrested on a beach in northwest Washington as they were allegedly preparing to smuggle about 260 pounds of cocaine into Canada on a personal watercraft.
A spokeswoman for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, Lorie Dankers, says 48-year-old Dhymitruy Bouryiotis and 36-year-old Montgomery Read Hill, both from the Vancouver, British Columbia, area, were arrested for investigation of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute.
An agency news release says that at about 1:30 a.m. Friday, federal border agents observed a person, later identified as Bouryiotis, moving heavy objects from a home to the shoreline at Birch Point, southwest of Blaine and a short distance south of the Canadian border.
About 2:30 a.m., a personal watercraft approached the beach and the operator, identified as Hill, met up with Bouryiotis on the beach, where they were arrested.
Agents found five bags on the beach filled with packages of suspected cocaine.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Client assaults public defender
By TRICIA MANNING-SMITH / KING 5 News
LYNNWOOD, Wash. – He is always on the "other side of the fence" – arguing for leniency for the alleged bad guys.
But this time, a local public defender reportedly fell prey himself to a client's fist.
He didn't see it coming, but there is visual testimony that this unsuspecting lawyer was caught off-guard.
"I have a broken nose, I have the black eyes, and it's kind of bleeding over to the other side," said Jim Feldman. "It doesn't feel great. I'm wondering how I didn't see it coming."
"I leaned down to get to the file. The next thing I experienced was a punch," he continued. "Then he hit me again. I felt the second punch."
Outside attorney Jim Feldman's office door, associate attorney Joseph Jordan responded to the fracas.
"I heard a scuffle and a punch," he said. "I was trying to get into the room, he was trying to get out of the room and he pushed me aside."
The suspect allegedly tried to flee the office, but then other workers attacked him right outside the door.
"I just chased him out to the parking lot and I guess I tackled him in the parking lot," said Jordan.
Tuesday's brouhaha erupted from a seemingly minor complaint. David Linden allegedly visited the office of his former attorney demanding a consultation on an old DUI case.
"He was obviously getting more agitated, his voice was rising somewhat," said Feldman. "I said, just sit down and be calm, I don't want to have to call the police."
Feldman says the suspect hit him twice – the first time on the cheekbone.
Now, this public defender finds himself in a unique position.
"I'm always on the other side of the fence, arguing for leniency for the defendant, and now the level of violence impacted me directly," he said.
Police arrested the suspect for second-degree assault. Feldman is still considering how lenient he now feels.
Attorney Jim Feldman has worked as a public defender for nearly 35 years, and although he's been verbally attacked, he says he's never faced physical violence before.
LYNNWOOD, Wash. – He is always on the "other side of the fence" – arguing for leniency for the alleged bad guys.
But this time, a local public defender reportedly fell prey himself to a client's fist.
He didn't see it coming, but there is visual testimony that this unsuspecting lawyer was caught off-guard.
"I have a broken nose, I have the black eyes, and it's kind of bleeding over to the other side," said Jim Feldman. "It doesn't feel great. I'm wondering how I didn't see it coming."
"I leaned down to get to the file. The next thing I experienced was a punch," he continued. "Then he hit me again. I felt the second punch."
Outside attorney Jim Feldman's office door, associate attorney Joseph Jordan responded to the fracas.
"I heard a scuffle and a punch," he said. "I was trying to get into the room, he was trying to get out of the room and he pushed me aside."
The suspect allegedly tried to flee the office, but then other workers attacked him right outside the door.
"I just chased him out to the parking lot and I guess I tackled him in the parking lot," said Jordan.
Tuesday's brouhaha erupted from a seemingly minor complaint. David Linden allegedly visited the office of his former attorney demanding a consultation on an old DUI case.
"He was obviously getting more agitated, his voice was rising somewhat," said Feldman. "I said, just sit down and be calm, I don't want to have to call the police."
Feldman says the suspect hit him twice – the first time on the cheekbone.
Now, this public defender finds himself in a unique position.
"I'm always on the other side of the fence, arguing for leniency for the defendant, and now the level of violence impacted me directly," he said.
Police arrested the suspect for second-degree assault. Feldman is still considering how lenient he now feels.
Attorney Jim Feldman has worked as a public defender for nearly 35 years, and although he's been verbally attacked, he says he's never faced physical violence before.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Police arrest two in home invasion robbery
P-I STAFF
Snohomish County sheriff's detectives have arrested two men suspected in a home invasion robbery during which the victim was tied up for several hours.
The robbery happened on Dec. 4 sometime between 10 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. at a home in the 9000 block of 163rd Avenue SW.
Investigators said the two men overpowered a woman who was home alone at the time and tied her up. They then stole a pickup truck and some guns.
On Monday, Tacoma police stopped a car for a traffic violation and found the passenger, a 40-year-old man, with a bag that had some of the items stolen in the robbery. That man was booked into the Pierce County Jail.
On Tuesday, Snohomish County deputies arrested a 31-year-old Arlington man, also during a traffic stop, and booked him into the Snohomish County Jail. Both are expected to face charges connected with the home invasion robbery, including robbery, kidnapping and burglary.
The sheriff's office said the men likely cased the neighborhood prior to the robbery and selected the victim's home after deciding there would be valuables inside. Detectives have recovered some of the stolen items.
Snohomish County sheriff's detectives have arrested two men suspected in a home invasion robbery during which the victim was tied up for several hours.
The robbery happened on Dec. 4 sometime between 10 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. at a home in the 9000 block of 163rd Avenue SW.
Investigators said the two men overpowered a woman who was home alone at the time and tied her up. They then stole a pickup truck and some guns.
On Monday, Tacoma police stopped a car for a traffic violation and found the passenger, a 40-year-old man, with a bag that had some of the items stolen in the robbery. That man was booked into the Pierce County Jail.
On Tuesday, Snohomish County deputies arrested a 31-year-old Arlington man, also during a traffic stop, and booked him into the Snohomish County Jail. Both are expected to face charges connected with the home invasion robbery, including robbery, kidnapping and burglary.
The sheriff's office said the men likely cased the neighborhood prior to the robbery and selected the victim's home after deciding there would be valuables inside. Detectives have recovered some of the stolen items.
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Two Port of Seattle executives resign in fraud scanda
By GLENN FARLEY / KING 5 News
SEATTLE – Two Port of Seattle executives have resigned in the wake of the Port fraud scandal and more employees could be punished.
“Both employees submitted their resignation after being confronted with this information and I have accepted their resignation,” said Port CEO Tay Yoshitani.
A disciplinary report was released Tuesday morning. Most of the fraud findings involve the third runway at Sea-Tac Airport and a cozy relationship between several Port executives and contractors which resulted in things like altered invoices and no competition in some of the bidding.
Yoshitani identified the executives who resigned as Larry McFadden, General Manager of Port Construction Services and John Rothney, Project Manager for the third runway.
No further resignations or firings have been announced, but more discipline is expected.
The Port’s chief engineer will receive a three week suspension without pay due to his knowledge of a memo in his possession that identified the misrepresentation of some documents that went to the elected Port commission.
Three senior managers have received one week suspension without pay for failing to mention the contingent nature of these contract adjustments that lowered the value of a bid.
A letter of reprimand has been placed in the files of the deputy CEO, the Sea-Tac Airport director and the general counsel because of their positions of authority.
Through all of it, the lead investigator, former U.S. Attorney Mike McKay, says they found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing by individuals.
Though they have no totals, the auditors say millions were wasted. They say one contractor known as TTI made profits on the third runway that were double and even triple the normal amount.
Yoshitani says a lot of people were obligated to blow the whistle on what was happening and didn’t do so.
SEATTLE – Two Port of Seattle executives have resigned in the wake of the Port fraud scandal and more employees could be punished.
“Both employees submitted their resignation after being confronted with this information and I have accepted their resignation,” said Port CEO Tay Yoshitani.
A disciplinary report was released Tuesday morning. Most of the fraud findings involve the third runway at Sea-Tac Airport and a cozy relationship between several Port executives and contractors which resulted in things like altered invoices and no competition in some of the bidding.
Yoshitani identified the executives who resigned as Larry McFadden, General Manager of Port Construction Services and John Rothney, Project Manager for the third runway.
No further resignations or firings have been announced, but more discipline is expected.
The Port’s chief engineer will receive a three week suspension without pay due to his knowledge of a memo in his possession that identified the misrepresentation of some documents that went to the elected Port commission.
Three senior managers have received one week suspension without pay for failing to mention the contingent nature of these contract adjustments that lowered the value of a bid.
A letter of reprimand has been placed in the files of the deputy CEO, the Sea-Tac Airport director and the general counsel because of their positions of authority.
Through all of it, the lead investigator, former U.S. Attorney Mike McKay, says they found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing by individuals.
Though they have no totals, the auditors say millions were wasted. They say one contractor known as TTI made profits on the third runway that were double and even triple the normal amount.
Yoshitani says a lot of people were obligated to blow the whistle on what was happening and didn’t do so.
Monday, December 8, 2008
Marijuana grow operation found
By TONYA MOSLEY / KING 5 News
RENTON, Wash. - King County Sheriff's detectives in Renton have discovered what they call a significant marijuana grow operation.
At least several hundred plants were discovered in a home where children live.
Puget Sound Energy crews checked the meters at the Renton home for signs that someone might have diverted the electricity in an effort to hide a major marijuana grow.
It’s not surprising to those who live nearby.
“We know the places to watch out for and it's not surprising that there's a problem down the street,” said Steve Colbeth.
The Sheriff's Department was called after a Child Protective Services worker arrived to do a welfare check.
At some point, someone reporting smelling a strong scent of marijuana. Detectives say soon afterward, they discovered the operation.
Authorities obtained a warrant and expected to be in the house all night, clearing out the marijuana.
It was not immediately known if any arrests were made.
RENTON, Wash. - King County Sheriff's detectives in Renton have discovered what they call a significant marijuana grow operation.
At least several hundred plants were discovered in a home where children live.
Puget Sound Energy crews checked the meters at the Renton home for signs that someone might have diverted the electricity in an effort to hide a major marijuana grow.
It’s not surprising to those who live nearby.
“We know the places to watch out for and it's not surprising that there's a problem down the street,” said Steve Colbeth.
The Sheriff's Department was called after a Child Protective Services worker arrived to do a welfare check.
At some point, someone reporting smelling a strong scent of marijuana. Detectives say soon afterward, they discovered the operation.
Authorities obtained a warrant and expected to be in the house all night, clearing out the marijuana.
It was not immediately known if any arrests were made.
Friday, December 5, 2008
Two teens arrested in Federal Way shooting
P-I STAFF
Federal Way police have arrested two teens in connection with a shooting that left two other teens injured Thursday.
The shooting happened just past 2:30 p.m. Thursday near Alderdale Park in the 2700 block of SW 340th Place, police said.
Officers found the two victims, ages 17 and 19, inside a parked Dodge Magnum. The older teen, a Kent resident, was taken to Harborview Medical Center with what police described as life-threatening injuries. He was last listed in critical condition. The second teen, of Federal Way, was also taken to the hospital. He is expected to survive his injuries.
Police believe the two victims were involved in some sort of drug transaction with the two teens accused in the shooting.
The teens arrested in the matter, ages 15 and 17, have since been booked into the King County Juvenile Detention Center for investigation of first-degree assault.
Federal Way police have arrested two teens in connection with a shooting that left two other teens injured Thursday.
The shooting happened just past 2:30 p.m. Thursday near Alderdale Park in the 2700 block of SW 340th Place, police said.
Officers found the two victims, ages 17 and 19, inside a parked Dodge Magnum. The older teen, a Kent resident, was taken to Harborview Medical Center with what police described as life-threatening injuries. He was last listed in critical condition. The second teen, of Federal Way, was also taken to the hospital. He is expected to survive his injuries.
Police believe the two victims were involved in some sort of drug transaction with the two teens accused in the shooting.
The teens arrested in the matter, ages 15 and 17, have since been booked into the King County Juvenile Detention Center for investigation of first-degree assault.
Saturday, November 22, 2008
The following cases of note were decided recently in Washington's high courts:
By: Dena Alo-Colbeck
Supreme Court:
State v. Warren: The Court held that comments by the prosecutor that suggested that the defendant did not enjoy the benefit of reasonable doubt constituted prosecutorial misconduct, in that the comments were improper and prejudicial to the defendant. The Court also found improper comments by the same prosecutor in a related trial with the same defendant that presumed facts not in evidence and commented on the role of defense counsel. However, the Court found that the curative instructions given by the trial court eliminated any prejudice that may otherwise have been caused by these comments. The Court further held that an order barring contact between the defendant and his wife for life was not an abuse of discretion despite the fact that the order was with a class of person different from the crime victim, because in this case the defendant has a history of domestic violence against his wife, and his wife's testimony in the trial had been instrumental in convicting the defendant, so that protecting the wife was in fact directly related to the crimes in this case. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/793565.opn.pdf
Division One Court of Appeals:
State v. Hall: The Court ruled that the defendant's double jeopardy protection was not violated when he was convicted of multiple courts of tampering with witnesses, as the unit of prosecution for the crime of witness tampering is "any one instance of attempting to induce a witness or a person to do any of the actions set forth in RCW 9A.72.120." A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60538-1.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Chang: The Court held that a warrantless search of the defendant's car properly came under the protective search exception to the warrant requirement when officers had information that there was a gun in the defendant's car and the defendant was only a couple of strides from the vehicle when he was detained. The Court further held that there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction for possession of stolen property (access devices) based upon checks that were in the defendant's possession, despite the exception in the law for paper instruments, because the State charged the defendant with possession of stolen property based on the account numbers on the checks, which defendant had used to illegally obtain money from the victims' accounts. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60743-0.pub.doc.pdf
Division Two Court of Appeals:
Aberdeen v. Regan: The Court held that a revocation of probation based on a condition that the defendant have no criminal law violations does not require a finding of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, simply evidence "sufficient to reasonably satisfy the court that the defendant violated a condition of probation." A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/36715-7.08.doc.pdf
Division Three Court of Appeals:
State v. Beito: The Court held that the defendant was seized when, as a passenger in a vehicle, the officer stood outside his door, blocking his exit, told him he was not free to leave, and continued to stand outside his door while conducting a warrant check over the radio. At the time, the Court found that the officers had no reasonable articulable suspicion that the defendant had committed or was about to commit a crime or that he was a threat to anyone's safety, the seizure was in violation of his right to privacy, and all evidence obtained as a result of the search, including evidence of warrants out for the defendant's arrest found during the warrant check conducted while the officer stood outside the defendant's door must be suppressed, and the case dismissed. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/263797.opn.doc.pdf
State v. Grogan: The Court held properly admissible statements child hearsay statements, ruling that the trial court properly found the child competent, and the statements met both the statutory requirements and the Ryan reliability factors. The court further found that the defendant's statements to the police were admissible when the defendant had voluntarily surrendered himself for an interview and polygraph, was told he was free to leave at any time, and was allowed to leave when he first asked to do so. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/265111.opn.doc.pdf
Supreme Court:
State v. Warren: The Court held that comments by the prosecutor that suggested that the defendant did not enjoy the benefit of reasonable doubt constituted prosecutorial misconduct, in that the comments were improper and prejudicial to the defendant. The Court also found improper comments by the same prosecutor in a related trial with the same defendant that presumed facts not in evidence and commented on the role of defense counsel. However, the Court found that the curative instructions given by the trial court eliminated any prejudice that may otherwise have been caused by these comments. The Court further held that an order barring contact between the defendant and his wife for life was not an abuse of discretion despite the fact that the order was with a class of person different from the crime victim, because in this case the defendant has a history of domestic violence against his wife, and his wife's testimony in the trial had been instrumental in convicting the defendant, so that protecting the wife was in fact directly related to the crimes in this case. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/793565.opn.pdf
Division One Court of Appeals:
State v. Hall: The Court ruled that the defendant's double jeopardy protection was not violated when he was convicted of multiple courts of tampering with witnesses, as the unit of prosecution for the crime of witness tampering is "any one instance of attempting to induce a witness or a person to do any of the actions set forth in RCW 9A.72.120." A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60538-1.pub.doc.pdf
State v. Chang: The Court held that a warrantless search of the defendant's car properly came under the protective search exception to the warrant requirement when officers had information that there was a gun in the defendant's car and the defendant was only a couple of strides from the vehicle when he was detained. The Court further held that there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction for possession of stolen property (access devices) based upon checks that were in the defendant's possession, despite the exception in the law for paper instruments, because the State charged the defendant with possession of stolen property based on the account numbers on the checks, which defendant had used to illegally obtain money from the victims' accounts. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/60743-0.pub.doc.pdf
Division Two Court of Appeals:
Aberdeen v. Regan: The Court held that a revocation of probation based on a condition that the defendant have no criminal law violations does not require a finding of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, simply evidence "sufficient to reasonably satisfy the court that the defendant violated a condition of probation." A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/36715-7.08.doc.pdf
Division Three Court of Appeals:
State v. Beito: The Court held that the defendant was seized when, as a passenger in a vehicle, the officer stood outside his door, blocking his exit, told him he was not free to leave, and continued to stand outside his door while conducting a warrant check over the radio. At the time, the Court found that the officers had no reasonable articulable suspicion that the defendant had committed or was about to commit a crime or that he was a threat to anyone's safety, the seizure was in violation of his right to privacy, and all evidence obtained as a result of the search, including evidence of warrants out for the defendant's arrest found during the warrant check conducted while the officer stood outside the defendant's door must be suppressed, and the case dismissed. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/263797.opn.doc.pdf
State v. Grogan: The Court held properly admissible statements child hearsay statements, ruling that the trial court properly found the child competent, and the statements met both the statutory requirements and the Ryan reliability factors. The court further found that the defendant's statements to the police were admissible when the defendant had voluntarily surrendered himself for an interview and polygraph, was told he was free to leave at any time, and was allowed to leave when he first asked to do so. A copy of the decision may be viewed online at: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/265111.opn.doc.pdf
Friday, November 21, 2008
Judge accused of being rude, undignified
By DEBORAH FELDMAN / KING 5 News
SEATTLE – At a hearing at the King County Courthouse Wednesday, members of the state Commission on Judicial Conduct listened to testimony against King County Judge Judy Eiler.
In 2005, Eiler was found guilty by the commission of being rude and undignified on the bench and sent to get more training. Now she's facing the same allegations again.
In an unusual role reversal, a parade of witnesses who once testified before Eiler came to testify about her Wednesday.
"I just felt she was very rude, very curt," Tammy Mazanti said." Very mean."
Eiler has been a King County District Court judge since 1992, primarily overseeing cases in civil and traffic court.
Members of the Washington State Commission on Judicial Conduct on Wednesday listened to audio tapes of Eiler on the bench. In addition, numerous witnesses and defendants from Eiler's past court proceedings described behavior they found rude, sarcastic and intimidating.
"I stood there and she was getting the papers ready and I was smiling because I was trying to be pleasant," Kris Mazanti said. "And she asked me do I think this is funny, and I said no, and she said well wipe that smirk off your face and I was stunned."
Several lawyers who've worked on cases before Eiler also testified they believe her behavior taints the judicial system.
Eiler's attorney said her client has a difficult job hearing 10 to 20 cases a day and pointed out that it's not a judge's job to be warm and fuzzy.
"It's a tough job," Anne Bremner said. "And when you take little snapshots of little parts of cases and what somebody felt when they lost and they have to come into court on it, I think that's inappropriate."
Given that she's been found guilty of rude and inappropriate behavior before, the commission could remove Eiler from the bench.
Testimony could continue through Friday. The commission will likely have a decision by early December.
SEATTLE – At a hearing at the King County Courthouse Wednesday, members of the state Commission on Judicial Conduct listened to testimony against King County Judge Judy Eiler.
In 2005, Eiler was found guilty by the commission of being rude and undignified on the bench and sent to get more training. Now she's facing the same allegations again.
In an unusual role reversal, a parade of witnesses who once testified before Eiler came to testify about her Wednesday.
"I just felt she was very rude, very curt," Tammy Mazanti said." Very mean."
Eiler has been a King County District Court judge since 1992, primarily overseeing cases in civil and traffic court.
Members of the Washington State Commission on Judicial Conduct on Wednesday listened to audio tapes of Eiler on the bench. In addition, numerous witnesses and defendants from Eiler's past court proceedings described behavior they found rude, sarcastic and intimidating.
"I stood there and she was getting the papers ready and I was smiling because I was trying to be pleasant," Kris Mazanti said. "And she asked me do I think this is funny, and I said no, and she said well wipe that smirk off your face and I was stunned."
Several lawyers who've worked on cases before Eiler also testified they believe her behavior taints the judicial system.
Eiler's attorney said her client has a difficult job hearing 10 to 20 cases a day and pointed out that it's not a judge's job to be warm and fuzzy.
"It's a tough job," Anne Bremner said. "And when you take little snapshots of little parts of cases and what somebody felt when they lost and they have to come into court on it, I think that's inappropriate."
Given that she's been found guilty of rude and inappropriate behavior before, the commission could remove Eiler from the bench.
Testimony could continue through Friday. The commission will likely have a decision by early December.
Troopers checking for seatbelt offenders at night
By ELISA HAHN / KING 5 News
SEATTLE – Beware! If you're driving at night and you're not buckled up, state troopers will track you down.
For the next three weeks, 60 police agencies across the state are conducting extra seatbelt crackdowns at nighttime.
The Washington State Patrol says there's a very good reason they are targeting seatbelt offenders at night.
The goal is to catch seatbelt offenders at nighttime because they tend to be different from drivers caught during the day.
"The people who chose not to wear their seatbelt at night tend to be involved in other criminal activity," said Sgt. Harlan Jackson, Washington State Patrol. "So we might not be just pulling over someone for a seatbelt, that might lead to someone driving under the influence."
From 2001 to 2007, Washington State saw more than 3,200 vehicle crash deaths – about 1,500 during the day, and 1,600 at night.
It may seem almost equal but the death rate at night is four times as high when you factor in how many people are on the road.
Studies show wearing your seatbelts can reduce that risk by 70 percent.
Washington State has one of the highest compliance rates in the country, but they estimate about 4 percent of drivers or passengers aren't wearing their seatbelt and that comes out to almost 240,000 lives that could be saved.
SEATTLE – Beware! If you're driving at night and you're not buckled up, state troopers will track you down.
For the next three weeks, 60 police agencies across the state are conducting extra seatbelt crackdowns at nighttime.
The Washington State Patrol says there's a very good reason they are targeting seatbelt offenders at night.
The goal is to catch seatbelt offenders at nighttime because they tend to be different from drivers caught during the day.
"The people who chose not to wear their seatbelt at night tend to be involved in other criminal activity," said Sgt. Harlan Jackson, Washington State Patrol. "So we might not be just pulling over someone for a seatbelt, that might lead to someone driving under the influence."
From 2001 to 2007, Washington State saw more than 3,200 vehicle crash deaths – about 1,500 during the day, and 1,600 at night.
It may seem almost equal but the death rate at night is four times as high when you factor in how many people are on the road.
Studies show wearing your seatbelts can reduce that risk by 70 percent.
Washington State has one of the highest compliance rates in the country, but they estimate about 4 percent of drivers or passengers aren't wearing their seatbelt and that comes out to almost 240,000 lives that could be saved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)